首页> 外文OA文献 >Time for a systematic review: A response to Bassett and Fogelman's 'Déjà vu or something new? The adaptation concept in the climate change literature'
【2h】

Time for a systematic review: A response to Bassett and Fogelman's 'Déjà vu or something new? The adaptation concept in the climate change literature'

机译:系统评价的时间:回应巴塞特和福格尔曼的“Déjàvu或新的东西?气候变化文献中的适应概念”

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This critical review debates the issues raised in Bassett and Fogelman's 2013 article "Déjà vu or something new? The adaptation concept in the climate change literature". After summarising the main findings of their article, we examine the methodology that Bassett and Fogelman adopted. We question the narrow sample of journals analysed, which we argue has led to a bias in the conclusions drawn. We use this opportunity to draw attention to the use of systematic literature reviews as an important methodological approach to synthesise the climate change adaptation literature. To demonstrate this we discuss the use of an alternate method more akin to that of a systematic literature review, and highlight where differences between this and the originally proposed methodology exist, and what this means for the concluding results.
机译:这篇重要的评论辩论了Bassett和Fogelman在2013年的文章“Déjàvu还是新事物?气候变化文献中的适应概念”中提出的问题。在总结了他们文章的主要发现之后,我们研究了Bassett和Fogelman采用的方法。我们质疑所分析期刊的样本狭窄,我们认为这导致所得出结论的偏见。我们借此机会提请人们注意使用系统的文献综述作为综合气候变化适应文献的重要方法论方法。为了证明这一点,我们讨论了一种更类似于系统文献综述的替代方法,并强调了该方法与最初提出的方法之间的区别,以及这对于结论的意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号